Last updated: 03-30-26
EMF Safe Living covers topics that intersect with health, technology, and environmental safety. That means the quality of our research matters. This page explains how we find, evaluate, and use sources when creating content for this site.
Where We Start
Every article begins with a research phase before any writing takes place. We identify the core question a reader is likely asking, then look for the best available evidence to answer it. For EMF topics this means starting with peer-reviewed scientific literature, regulatory guidance, and established safety standards rather than opinion pieces or product marketing materials.
Sources We Use
We prioritize sources that are independent, transparent about their methodology, and recognized within their field. These include:
- Peer-reviewed studies published in scientific journals
- Reports and guidelines from government health and safety agencies
- Standards from recognized bodies such as ICNIRP, IEEE, and the FCC
- Research from universities and independent research institutions
- Official product documentation and technical specifications
How We Evaluate Sources
Not all sources carry the same weight. When reviewing research we consider who conducted the study and whether they have conflicts of interest, how recent the research is and whether it has been replicated, the size and methodology of the study, and whether findings are consistent with the broader body of research on the topic. A single study rarely changes our position on a topic. We look for patterns across multiple sources before drawing conclusions.
How We Handle Uncertainty
EMF research is an active field and not every question has a clear answer. Where the science is settled we say so. Where it is contested or evolving we say that too. We do not present emerging concerns as established facts, and we do not dismiss legitimate questions because they lack definitive answers. Our job is to give readers an accurate picture of what is known and what is not.
Updating and Correcting Content
Research evolves and guidelines change. We review existing content regularly and update it when new information warrants a change. If a reader identifies an error or outdated information, we take those reports seriously and correct content promptly. Corrections are made to the live article without altering the original publication date.
What We Do Not Do
We do not cite sources we have not read. We do not use manufacturer claims as independent evidence. We do not publish content designed to alarm readers or push a particular product. And we do not present personal opinion as scientific consensus.